]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:40 am
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Kit_B — Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:34 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
The bottle of Paulaner was in great shape.
But, my helles tasted better.
I think I've found my go-to recipe & it'll be hard to keep in-stock.
My photo was poorly taken.
Bad light & condensation...
But, the beers were so close, in flavor & body that I was floored.
I'll try to post more photos & comparison data, when my current batch is ready.
Statistics: Posted by Kit_B — Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:22 am
]]>
So it was Paulaner Vs Bryan.
The Paulaner:
7 People tested.. Men and women. Each got 2 samples of Paulaner, 1 of mine. I tried to get the freshest least abused beer I could, but I could taste a hint of oxidation creeping in.
The results were actually unanimous, with mine being the winner. It was an easy choice for me because of the hint of oxidation. But got great feedback about freshness, crispness, lingering malt flavor. After we were done I poured them side by side. Obviously I think the outcome would have been different if one would be drinking these both fresh from the keg(probably a split), but they were strikingly similar for not even trying to clone them. Anyone who says reproducing these beers to be on par with the commercial examples can't be done is wrong.
Paulaner:
Mine:
Statistics: Posted by Bryan R — Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:41 am
]]>