[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 494: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 195: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3937)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 196: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3937)
German Brewing The German Brewing Forum Welcomes You 2016-05-08T08:51:30-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/feed.php?f=46&t=288 2016-05-08T08:51:30-04:00 2016-05-08T08:51:30-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=3009#p3009 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]>
http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/t ... val.76953/

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Sun May 08, 2016 8:51 am


]]>
2016-05-08T08:42:58-04:00 2016-05-08T08:42:58-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=3008#p3008 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]>
https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/ ... ic=22380.0

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Sun May 08, 2016 8:42 am


]]>
2016-04-06T21:24:23-04:00 2016-04-06T21:24:23-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2146#p2146 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]> https://www.morebeer.com/articles/oxidation_in_beer

Statistics: Posted by wobdee — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:24 pm


]]>
2016-04-06T09:52:55-04:00 2016-04-06T09:52:55-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2144#p2144 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]> From: "Steve Alexander" <steve-alexander at worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: HSA Problems

Larry Bristol across several posts writes ....

>I am somewhat surprised and disappointed in the hostile attitude I
>sense in your posting. I hope you are having a better day today.

Your mock concern is latent hostility, Larry. I just noted that Alistair was
ignorant of the effects of oxidation. No hostility intended. It's a pretty
common thing - f'rinstance you completely missed the boat ....

>I am somewhat bewildered by the implication that there is a
>relationship between HSA and spoilage due to oxidation.

>I consider HSA and oxidation to be separate and unrelated topics...

>I think that it is time someone pointed out a fact that apparently is
>not obvious: Aeration is *NOT* the same as oxidation

Bizarre comments. Nothing wrong with ignorance per se - it's the only
vantage point from which learning can take place - but when someone
misunderstands a topic yet makes jibes like 'my oxygen doesn't oxidize'
... - he's begging to play the fool.

Larry, if you took a trip to a decent library and looked under food science
you'd learn a lot about staling and oxidation. I suggest you make the trip,
but I'll give you a headstart.

That atmospheric oxygen is compounded with wort phenolics during the mash
and boil has appeared in journals since the early 1950s. Oxidized
phenolics can lead to coarser flavors and darker color. Your dictionary
translation of HSA is for the birds. G.Fix (I think) coined the term HSA
but refers to it without name on pp 130... of PoBS. The idea is from a
paper in Brewer's Journal, 1986 by Ohtsu et al who trace some fates of air
O2 taken up during mash&boil. The impact of oxygen taken from air during
mash&boil = HSA. There is no significant fate for oxygen in hot wort other
than oxidation !

I've posted a lot of citations before on the topic including the fine paper
Jim Adwell referenced. You want more, see ....
JIB105pp269-274 ' "Use of O18 ...impact of oxidation process... "
(great paper by the some of the same researcher as Adwell's reference)
JIBv105pp301-307 - "Flavour Impact of Aged Beers'
JIB89pp415-415 "Liberation of Staling Aldehydes during Beer Storage"
ASBC57(1)pp24-28 "....Protective Mechanism of Sulfite Against Beer Staling
...."
JIB105pp237-242 "Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Oxidation in the Brewhouse ..."
Bamforth.
(a survey article in which Bamforth calculates rates for various oxidation
mechanisms).

During Mash&Boil Bamforth notes (several studies) that small scale brews
uptake 50 to 200 ppm of O2 ! That's a *lot* of oxygen.

>You simply cannot get that much oxygen into the hot
>wort using ordinary means.

You can and do and it's been published for a long time. You're starting to
sound like Alistair.

A circumspect Pete Czerpak asks
<any idea what order reaction the main HSA reactions might be [...] ?

Bamforth addresses this. You have high O2 flow into wort due to rapid
depletion of O2 by oxidative processes. Bamforth estimates non-enzymatic
processes could consume 100ppm of O2 per second (given oxygen) !! It's
higher yet in the boil (near 1000ppm/sec). Wort has near zero dissolved
oxygen as oxidation uses it instantly. More O2 infuses from air by Henry's
Law. 'Course any splashing, stirring or air exposure adds in. One study
(need more) measures 2/3rd of the O2 uptake occurs during the boil !

Most of the O2 starts off oxidizing phenolics and much of that ends
up in the break. Still remaining oxidized phenolics are the cause of the
'coarser flavor and darker color' which Kunze attributes to HSA.
These are HSA's immediate effects. Lipid and reductone oxidation
also takes place and lipid oxidation is subject to chain reaction.

Other oxidation products take time to develop yet owe their origins
to HSA oxygen. Oxidized lipids later degrade into flavor
active compounds. Aldehydes form but are masked behind sulfites
(produced by yeast) only to reappear when the sulfite levels drop.
Reductones and phenolics carry their oxidation state into the beer
only to be involved in reactions that transfer the oxidation state to
a more flavor active compound after fermentation. Ascorbic acid
or reductones plus tiny amounts of Fe of Cu catalyze oxidation
transfers.

>Your experiment has nothing to do with HSA. It would prove only that
>accelerated oxidation occurs at 40C and that Alistair's friends could
>detect that.

Right, it has to do with detecting staling effects due to oxidation
processes which can get their O2 from HSA. Until Alistair wraps
his tongue around the idea that most of beer decline is due to
oxidative processes he doesn't know what to look for He
(and you perhaps) are just looking for cardboard flavor.

>I have
>never detected an off-flavor in any beer that could not readily be
>attributed to some tangible cause rather than HSA.

You've never had an ale pick up sweet caramel notes, never had a beer lose
IBUs over time, never had a beer go downhill after several months ? Never
had a subtle shift in flavor or added aldehydes as a dark beer ages out ?
Seems unlikely. I taste these problems regularly time in home brews.

>HSA is simply not
>something that I lie awake at night worrying about.

Worry is useless, which is why I don't bother, but there are measures worth
trying.

RE: Jim Adwell's reference.
> Drawing any other
>conclusions from the article is risky.

How about - "SO2 can reduce both lipid autooxidation and the nonenal
potential rise WHILE THE WORT IS BOILING". Much more important I think.

>The test
>batches had 4 liters of O2 bubbled through the mash during the first 15
>minutes.[...] but I defy a homebrewer to
>dissolve that much oxygen [...]

No one said it dissolved. They bubbled a gallon of O2 thru 13gal of wort in
15min. You can bubble that much O2 from air with a mechanical stirrer or a
RIMS.

>WHOA! Hot break removal --- now THERE is something I can get my hands
>around!

Break removal is important in keeping the oxidized long chain fatty acids
down, but you're missing the big picture.

Trans-2-nonenal (cardboard aldehyde) is a breakdown product of linoleic acid
oxidized in a certain way involving a specific lipo-oxygenase enzyme
(LOX-2). Barley and malt contain variable amounts of LOX-2.
Cardboard-aldehyde is the super-star of HSA products - but you could try
hard and never form any. The oxidized phenolics, hops oils, reductones and
others are NOT left in the break, do not require special enzymes and will
cause more common if less dramatic damage. The goal is to reduce
oxidation, not eliminate a single oxidation product.

A few practical suggestions ---
/sulfites in the mash/boil ***
/ CO2 or nitrogen in the mash/boiler headspace.
/ make a mash/boil 'float' to reduce surface area.
/ use a lid
/ use fresh crushed malt
/ remove break

(sulfite*** may effect 'repair' to damaged beer too).
*** some folks are allergic to sulfites.

Steven Parfitt's suggestion to pre-boil water is good thinking, but not very
effective. Less than 5% of the HSA oxygen is in the water.

-S

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:52 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:42:53-04:00 2016-04-06T09:42:53-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2143#p2143 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]>
https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/ ... pic=9230.0

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:42 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:50:07-04:00 2016-04-06T09:23:08-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2142#p2142 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]> From: "Steve Alexander" <steve-alexander at worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: HSA Problems - S Alexander's practical suggestions

Gregor Zellmann writes ...

>[...] I would
> like to know more about:
>
[...]]
> > /sulfites in the mash/boil ***
> Could you please report which sulfites you add to your boil/mash and how
> much of them?

I've used campden tablets (a combination of sodium and potassium
metabisulphite) at around 1 to 2 grams in the mash for a 20L batch of beer.
This should produce about 40-80ppm of SO2. This seems like a *lot* of
metabisulphite to me, but it's below the levels used by winemakers. Campden
tablets are commonly used by winemakers to develop 100ppm of sulphite in
unfermented wine must.

I've only done this a couple of times - pils beers both times - and the
method produce a notably light colored beer with good flavor
characteristics. I haven't performed a controlled test of the method.
Only recently, as I prepared an talk for the recent MCAB did I come to
realize all of the advantages that sulphites bestow.

Sulphites -
- inhibit certain of the oxidase enzymes in the mash,
- prevent the Maillard processes and phenolic oxidation that lead to wort
darkening,
- mask the flavors of aldehydes,
- reduce the rate of lipid auto-oxidation and carbonyl formation.

They're a cure-all, and except that some people are allergic, can be highly
recommended. Yeast, particularly certain lager yeasts, produce some
sulphites during fermentation.

In the ASBC paper that Jim Adwell gave the web-link for the other day the
researchers added comparable levels (1.275gm of potassium metabisulphite to
15L of wort) at he beginning of the boil (the ASBC paper has several typos
btw), and the beer had lower trans-2-nonenal potential than a control and
higher levels (1.5ppm) of SO2 in aged beer, and according to the authors
"very good stability". They measure the results in terms of oxididation
products - oxidized polyphenols, oxidized sulphites(sulphates), carbonyls
and oxidized isohumulone.

Some of the same Belgian authors published a study in (JIBv105pp269-274,
Noel et al) in which they take a commercial beer and treat it with various
"stabilization" chemicals and then age the samples both naturally at 20C
and also at 40C with some O18 isotopic oxygen in the headspace. Cold-side
aeration.

Sulphite (13ppm of SO2) strongly protected polyphenols from oxidation.
PVPP treatment reduced the levels of polyphenols, but increased the level of
sulphite oxidiation.
Ascorbic acid additions caused a huge increase in sulphite and polyphenol
oxidiation ! The mechanism is the same one that is involved when reductones
from dark malt appear in beer. Ascorbic and reductones are anti-oxidants -
but if they are oxidized and given a tiny amount of Cu or Fe - then they
actually catalyze the oxidation reactions.
- ----

> > / CO2 or nitrogen in the mash/boiler headspace.
> This suggestion obvioulsly *would* minimize contact of O2 and mash/wort,
but
> isn't it a bit expensive [...] How stabil are "cushions" (sp?) of CO2 on
mash (stiring)
> and wort (stiring, evaporation)?

'Cushions' of non-O2 gas are certainly imperfect barriers, but if used with
a lidded mash and a partially lidded boil I would expect that you would
decrease the amount of O2 at the wort surface considerably.

> > / make a mash/boil 'float' to reduce surface area.
> Possible while mashing. But doesn't one want a vigourous boil with an
> evaporation of around 10 % of the wort volume? A "float" on the wort
surface
> would greatly reduce the evaporation rate, no? I hate DMS related, cooked
> vegetable taste in my beers (and I know what I'm talking about here)!

I agree DMS is very bad. I had a lager at a brewpub last week that tasted
like DMS soup - just terrible.

A partial surface cover should not reduce the boil-off rate. Boil-off is
directly related to the amount of water vapor that must be removed to keep
the wort at the boiling point. If the boiloff is reduced and the heat in
and out otherwise is held constant - then pressure must build up which is
not possible. My hunch is that boiling wort might boilover the float and
so have access to more oxygen.

> > / use a lid
> Same as above

Probably a better approach for the boiler than the 'float'. A lid can
reduce boiloff by condensing vapor (and heating the lid) and adding this
back to the wort. Still commercial brewery boilers have a vapor outlet that
is only a few percent of the boiler wort surface area. Very small vapor
aperatures compared to homebrew. I think that a partial lid with an
insulated top would be ideal. This would cause the lid to heat quickly and
reduce the amount of lid recondensation. The insulated lid would probably
get too hot to condense much DMS.

> > / use fresh crushed malt
> Easy for me

A couple studies show more lipid oxidation the longer the time from crush to
mash-in. Despite this there is a trend in the US for microbreweries to use
pre-crushed malt. I guess it doesn't matter if you the last of it by day 28
after pitching.

> > / remove break
> Pretty easy too


> Which of the mentioned methods are you using with your brews?

I've experimented with sulphite addition and it seems practical and it also
seems to have an clear effect on the beer color - so I have some confidence
that this is effective. I intend to use this more.

I have for some years used a lidded mash tun and a partly lidded boiler
(with a sheet of insulation material). I think this helps too.

I mash in a sanke, then I push a copper manifold to the tun bottom, and
recirculate wort till clear, then pump it (while adding sparge water to the
mash tun) into the boiler. I think that this prevents a certain abount of
oxygen exposure.

I probably don't practice adequate break removal ! A manifold, CFC and
recirculating pump make break separation convenient, but allows all the
cold break and some of the hot into the fermenter. An insertion chiller and
a racking cane probably are better for break removal. This could be solved
by using a secondary fermenter but that is sometimes inconvenient too.
Sometimes (not often) I've chilled unpitched wort to near freezing
overnight, and the cold break formation is impressive. I *think* this
level of break removal can be a good thing for the wort flavors - but the
yeast enjoy the trub lipids and particles so there is a corresponding loss.

A few years ago Andy Walsh (under the pseudonym Arnold Chickenshorts)
posted about adding a CO2 cushion to the mash-tun when the crushed malt was
added and using lids. I use this cushion at times, but I am uncertain
about its effectiveness.

-S

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:23 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:23:04-04:00 2016-04-06T09:23:04-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2141#p2141 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]>
https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/ ... ic=11392.0

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:23 am


]]>
2016-04-06T11:24:32-04:00 2016-04-06T09:22:35-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2140#p2140 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]> https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/ ... ic=11392.0

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:22 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:08:42-04:00 2016-04-06T09:08:42-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2138#p2138 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Sulfite Research]]>
Mashing
The grain in the mash should be underlet or infused with hot water from the bottom up. By infusing in this manner, stirring of the grains to insure uniform mixing of the grain and hot water is not necessary. By not stirring the water into the mash, hot oxygen reactions can be reduced. (Millspaw, 1992)

BYO recommends the following technique. Add 3L of water to the mash tun, then carefully add 1kg of malt and gently mix malt into water. Continue this process until all of the malt and water has been added. This process will take longer so be sure to adjust for temperature losses

Palmer (2006) recommends adding water a gallon at a time (to all of the malt) and gently mixing the water in without aerating. He states that HSA is promoted by lipoxygenase at this stage, although as Fix sates the levels required by this reaction are very low.

Millspaw (1992) recommends adding specialty malts only in the mash out. The melanoidins formed at 77°C/170°F are more stable than those formed at the lower temperatures of conventional mashing. By adding these specialty malts only in the mash out, the brewer can make his mash more efficient by optimizing saccarification, maximizing the formation of melanoidins. This will lead to smoother and rounder flavours from the specialty grains, as well as more stable and clearer beers (Millspaw, 1992).

Mash recycling tends to remove a lot of large particulate matter that would otherwise be present in the boil. Millspaw (1992) feels that these techniques are a source of HSA and that the particulates (husks and grits mostly) provide a place for proteins to clump onto during the boil and then settle out more effectively in cooling.

However, Fix emphasises that one of the most important points it achieving reasonable wort clarity in lautering (Fix, 1999).
Transferring to the boiler

In practice if the power is switched on immediately the heating element is covered any uptake of oxygen is immediately driven off by the action of the boil (Alexander, 2009). Personally, I now collect using a tube into a 5 gallon bucket and then siphon from my collection vessel into the boiler.

Post Boil
Older books used to advocate pouring the boiling hot wort from one bucket to another to add oxygen and cool it. Unfortunately, the wort is still hot enough to oxidise and not aerate. Pouring down the side of the bucket to minimise splashing doesn’t help either since this increases the surface area of the wort exposed to the air (Palmer, 2006). Ensure the wort is below 27C before aerating air (Palmer, 2006)

Storage
In fresh beers both T-2-N and its precursors are bound up with natural sulphur compounds from yeast metabolism. However, after a lag, which is reduced if thermal or mechanical abuse occurs, the effects of T-2-N become discernible. Millspaw (1992) and Bamforth (2009) also emphasise the importance of storage temperatures. The Arrhenius equation shows that for every 10C rise in temperature a chemical reaction will perform 2-3x faster. For example if you store a beer at 20C a beer may stale in three months. A stored beer at 30C will stale in one month.

Additives
Additives could be one solution, however, the effective additives tend to have unacceptable side effects and the neutral ones rarely seem to work (Fix, 1999). The most likely additive to be of any use in the home brew environment is Potassium Metabisulphate (Campden Tablets) added to the mash (Fix, 1999, Spencer, 2006) which binds to carbonyl compounds. These haven’t gained favour in the commercial world because above certain 10ppm levels they must be stated on packaging and we “can let the wine have that dirty labelling†(Bamforth, 2009). It may therefore be an option to us, the bisulphates will bind to the staling aldeydes and masks their presence. However, these bonds are rather short lived in beer, and when they are broken, the staling aldehydes fully reveal their presence (Fix, 1999)

Summary
The effects of oxygen pick-up after fermentation are more apparent and severe than the effects of hot-side aeration. If you are thinking about changing your brewing procedure to avoid oxidation, you should begin addressing oxygen pick-up from the end of the process and work your way forward toward mashing (BYO). It is a complex interplay of reactions, including unsaturated fatty acids, melanoidins and iso-alpha-acids. It is therefore too simplistic to focus on just T-2-N as the sole cause of staling in beer (Bamforth, 1999).


References
Alexander, J (2002). Hot Side Aeration (HSA). Brewers Contact. 9, 2-5. Also published at http://www.craftbrewing.org.uk/bc/backissues.html
BYO. http://www.byo.com/stories/techniques/a ... -mr-wizard
Bamforth, C. (2009). Hot Side Aeration. The Brewing Network http://www.thebrewingnetwork.com/shows/475. Start at 13 minutes
Fix, G. (1999). Principles of Brewing Science, Second Edition. Brewers Publication (sorry not on the internet)
Garrod, P. (2008). Hot Side Aeration. Brewers Contact. 8, 4-5 Also published at http://www.craftbrewing.org.uk/bc/backissues.html
Spencer, J. (2006) Hot Side Aeration Exeriment 02/11/06. Basic Brewing radio. http://www.basicbrewing.com/index.php?page=60
Millspaw (1992). Hot Side Aeration and Beer Stability. Zymurgy. 15. Also published at http://oz.craftbrewer.org/Library/Metho ... mash.shtml

Statistics: Posted by Bryan R — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:08 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:48:12-04:00 2016-04-06T09:08:06-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2137#p2137 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Oxidation or Sulfite Research]]>
The flavor that I am trying to understand in a German Lager is not rotten egg (H2S) or struck match flavor (SO2). It is also not “cooked corn to cooked vegetables, cabbage, onion, even garlic”. As I posted previously I used the words “buttery sweetness” but I am uncomfortable with that description; I am very sensitive to diacetyl (which is typically described as buttery or butterscotch). The flavor that I am perceiving in some German Lagers is not diacetyl (I think).

I am not very good at putting flavors into words so I am really hoping to not have to express them. I would prefer that somebody would just say to me something like: DMS in Pilsners at non-excessive levels provides an xyz flavor which encourages a roundness and fullness to the beer (or something like that).

“Sulfur compounds:

Sulfur compounds are responsible for some of the most dramatic beer flavors. Some of the most aromatic aroma compounds have minute flavor thresholds and so, even though they are present in small quantities, can dramatically affect a beer’s flavor.

Sulfur compounds have their origins in the ingredients we use. Sulfate, sulfite and sulfide ions in the water, and sulfur compounds present in malt and hops, can all lead to sulfur flavors in the beer. Some, such as the frequently encountered DMS, have their origins in the malthouse or the brewery. Others, such as the skunky 3-methyl-2-butene-thiol, are formed from the reaction between light and hop compounds in the package.

Of the compounds actually formed during fermentation there are two main compounds of interest. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is the aroma of rotten eggs. Its flavor threshold is only around 4–10 parts per billion but it may be found in beer at levels of 200 parts per billion. At low concentrations, it rounds out the flavor of pale lager beers but at higher concentrations is definitely an off flavor. Some yeast strains are prone to producing more H2S than others, and lager brewers in Europe may base their choice of yeast strain on the amount of sulfur it produces. Growing yeast cells require sulfur for amino acid production, protein structure, and CoEnzymeA formation. Sulfate ions in wort are actively taken up by yeast and biochemically reduced to hydrogen sulfide. Once the need for those certain sulfur containing amino acids is met, the excess H2S is excreted from the cell. If the wort is lacking any nutrient, that may affect yeast growth then sulfur may be produced in excess.

Luckily, H2S is very volatile and is removed with evolving carbon dioxide during fermentation. Capping a fermentation vessel too early can trap H2S in beer, and higher fermentation temperatures can increase the levels. Some commercial brewers experience problems when they increase batch size as they expand production. Taller tanks can cause a pressure differential at the tank base and increase sulfur production. Wort spoiling micro-organisms can also produce copious amounts of H2S.

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is the drying, struck match flavor and aroma sometimes found in beer. It is rare that it should be detectable in American beers although it is more common in English beers. In the UK, commercial brewers add it to beers as a preservative. It is able to mop up excess oxygen in solution and that is the primary mechanism, but it can also react with, and bind to, compounds that may eventually create stale flavors.

Sulfur dioxide can combine with aldehydes in wort to form compounds that survive processing. This prevents the aldehyde oxidizing further to stale flavors. However, if this comes into contact with air during storage it can oxidize back to sulfate and the aldehyde, which in turn reacts with a higher alcohol to produce trans-2-nonenal, the compound responsible for the cardboard taste in stale beer.

Sulfur dioxide can also be liberated from yeast cells when the growth cycle goes awry. It can be added to beer inadvertently along with isinglass finings when these finings are used as a preservative.

Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a troublesome flavor in beer. It can vary in intensity from cooked corn to cooked vegetables, cabbage, onion, even garlic. In Pilsner lagers, it adds a fullness and roundness to the flavor, and some pale American pilsners benefit from a fresh corn-like aroma. It has its origins in malt and is removed from beer by aggressive and volatile wort boiling.”

Cheers!.

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:08 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:07:03-04:00 2016-04-06T09:07:03-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2136#p2136 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Sulfite Research]]> "Negative effects due to HSA are usually reflected in a flavor the
Germans call "Herbstoffe." Roughly translated this means "grain bitter"
or "grain astringency."

There are some theoretical considerations which suggest HSA should
be a nonissue. Ironically, the same issues arise in a project I am
currently working on which involve beers very far removed in character
from Lambics. Herbstoffe arises from the presence of what could be
called HSA aldehydes. These in turn arise from the interaction of
ethanol in beer (as well as some other things) and products which were
oxidized on the hot side of wort production. The HSA aldehydes have
been isolated, and definitely display "grain astringent" flavors.
Moreover, it has also been shown that most Saccharomyces will ignore
them. Thus, in most beers, if present, they will spill over into the
finished beer and display Herbstoffe."

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:07 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:05:58-04:00 2016-04-06T09:05:58-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2135#p2135 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Sulfite Research]]> HSA is a term that includes oxygen uptake in the mash & boil both. This
is in contract to cool-side aeration after the chill. Some studies in the
late 1968 and up to recent years attempt to trace out the fate of oxygen
in wort & beer and make decisions about there relative "badness" based on
their chemical fates. Anyway the early papers (and many since) indicate
that HSA oxygen has negative impact on flavor and flavor stability.

Chas Bamforth published a terrific paper in JIB about 5 years ago
calculating the enzymatic and catalytic pathways for various oxygen
species in the mash, then correlated his estimate with published studies
of the total O2 uptake in the mash.

Despite the fact the oxygen is not very soluble at mash temps and above -
many times the saturation level of oxygen is chemically compounded with
the mash during the mash. Nearly all of this oxygen transpires through
the air-mash boundary. Bamforth calculates that the catalytic processes
in the mash are sufficient to use up saturation levels of oxygen in a
matter of seconds !! So the mash is almost devoid of oxygen and
Henry's Law of partial pressures forces atmospheric O2 into the mash.

Bamforth doesn't directly address the issue of O2 uptake in the boil,
but if we assume the enzymatic mechanisms are lost and the metal ion
catalytic mechanisms (which are the stronger ones) are enhanced by
temperture, then the boil is probably at least as bad in terms of
oxidized products as the mash.

All this oxygen ends up compounded with wort constituents. Oxidized
oils are probably primarily produced in the mash by the action various
lipo-oxygenase enzymes. These damaged oils break down producing the
trans-2-nonenal cardboard aroma and other aldehydic aromas.
Quantitatively phenolic compounds are the greatest destination for this
oxygen in wort. Simeple phenolic compounds often have pleasant fresh
flavors - or at least innocuous ones. Oxidized phenolics are more
bitter and will polymerize and eventually produce astringency. They
also are removed to some extent in the break material and in the
"dregs" left behind in the lagering process. Fining materials like
PVPP will remove oxidized phenolics too. Many other materials in
wort are oxidized in the mash & boil too.

After the chill, a fermentation is created and the yeast during their
anaerobic ferment have a dilemma - they are required to chemically
reduce the material in their environment to achieve a redox balance.
The major destination of all this reduction is in the creation of
ethanol from acetaldehyde, but also the conversion of other aldehydes
into alcohols and some other very flavor positive effects. Yeast
also leave a little (2-15ppm) of sulfite behind in the beer and
sulfite is an antioxidant. My hunch is that lager yeasts are
the better sulfite producers, and most ale yeasts - not so much.

More recently Morton Meilgard(sp?) has noted that some of the
extreme oxygen elimination methods developed for commercial brewing
have not proven to create a measurable improvement in flavor IN
COMMERCIAL BREWING.

Note that the amount of O2 exposure is largely related to the surface
area:volume ratio of the mash tun & copper. Also the amount of
"splashing" and transfer activity must impact this significantly.
Small HB tuns will therefore have a lot more potential for HSA,
than deeper commercial tuns. Oxidation is clearly more problematic
the smaller (shallower actually) the mash.

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:05 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:03:22-04:00 2016-04-06T09:03:22-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2134#p2134 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Sulfite Research]]> From: "David Houseman" <david.houseman at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Homebrew Taste
Mike,
I agree that oxidation, from old stale liquid malt extract and hot-side
aeration is one of the problems with some homebrew. However in my
experience this doesn't result in the "wet cardboard" form of oxidation
which is more typically from oxygen introduced post fermentation. Rather
the result I sense is a dullness with muted, caramel-like notes. Oxidation
can take a number of sensory forms, and each person may describe their
perception differently so we may agree that oxidation isn't good and we
don't like the results.
David Houseman

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:03 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:47:43-04:00 2016-04-06T09:00:07-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2133#p2133 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Sulfite Research]]> From: "\\-s at roadrunner.com" <"\\-s"@roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: Oxidation Help

James R. Gregory asks for help regarding oxidation...

> I am a relatively new all grain home brewer and am trying to get rid of a
> slight "homebrew" taste in some of my brews. I suspect it may be oxidation
> related. To date I have bottle condition all brews.
>
>
>
> I am looking for advice on preventing oxidation. I try to keep splashing,
> etc. to a minimum when transferring from carboy to bottling bucket. So I am
> looking for other tips and any comments on the following:
>
>
>
> 1. Should I flush carboys, bottling bucket and bottles with co2. I
> read the recent "flushing" discussion and am still confused. Stupid
> question, but, if this is a good idea what is best way to get co2 equipment
> and rough cost.

You don't need to flush your primary fermenter as you want the yeast to
have access to O2. If you move the beer to a secondary fermenter you
should always do so while there is active fermentation under way - and
again there is no need to flush so long as the container is reasonable
full (95% full not 50%) and don't splash. If you are bottle
conditioning then I wouldn't use O2 scavenging caps, and you can just
fill normally and leave a cap sitting on top of the bottle to rest for a
minute before sealing. The CO2 from the beer will push out most of the
O2, and the remainder can be used by the yeast.

> 2. Are the more expensive bottling caps that absorb oxygen worth the
> money.
If you are bottling w/o bottle conditioning and you intend to store the
beer for much time or at suboptimal temps - then yes.


> 3. I have heard that adding a very small amount of sodium or potassium
> bisulfite to brew prevents oxidation. Anything to this and, if so, how is
> it done.
Yes - it's very effective. I suggest you start with campden tablets
(commonly used for wine making
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campden_tablets), or alternatively you can
get potassium metabisulfite powder which may be slightly better. I'd
add a minimum of 2 campden tables (~1gm) crushed to a 5 gallon mash.
You can certainly triple that amount. With "too much" you'll eventually
get a sulfury edge to the beer - not unlike a white wine - tho it
'works' well with some lagers.

Generally this makes the beer taste much fresher and a little crisper.
The sulfite acts as an anti-oxidant and even can convert come already
oxidized flavor actors to unoxidized states. The end products are
sulfate (which you may be adding as gypsum) and a little sodium or
potassium.

> 4. Any other suggestions.

In my experience it's rare to get bottle oxidation in a bottle
conditioned beer. I've done side-by-sides and the bottle conditioned
beers really do taste better much longer (it's just such a PITA to
bottle). So IF your problem is really oxidation - it's either happening
in the mash or else your ingredients are oxidized. Metabite in the mash
will cure any mash oxidation problem and maybe even help any ingredient
issues a little. My main ingredient concern would be to use good hops.
Hops oxidation is a real potential problem.

Another possibility is that you are getting yeast autolysis in the
bottle. Some yeast disintegrate after bottle conditioning and leave a
meaty-brothy flavor and even leaves some oily rancid flavors (a hint of
dead mouse). Most of the hi-alcohol ale yeasts do very well in the
bottle. Also you should end up with a little opaque layer of yeast in
the bottom of bottle - not a quarter inch.

-S

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:00 am


]]>
2016-04-06T09:47:12-04:00 2016-04-06T08:58:41-04:00 http://forum.germanbrewing.net/viewtopic.php?t=288&p=2132#p2132 <![CDATA[Re: Previous Sulfite Research]]>
HSA is a term that includes oxygen uptake in the mash & boil both. This
is in contract to cool-side aeration after the chill. Some studies in the
late 1968 and up to recent years attempt to trace out the fate of oxygen
in wort & beer and make decisions about there relative "badness" based on
their chemical fates. Anyway the early papers (and many since) indicate
that HSA oxygen has negative impact on flavor and flavor stability.
Chas Bamforth published a terrific paper in JIB about 5 years ago
calculating the enzymatic and catalytic pathways for various oxygen
species in the mash, then correlated his estimate with published studies
of the total O2 uptake in the mash.

Despite the fact the oxygen is not very soluble at mash temps and above -
many times the saturation level of oxygen is chemically compounded with
the mash during the mash. Nearly all of this oxygen transpires through
the air-mash boundary. Bamforth calculates that the catalytic processes
in the mash are sufficient to use up saturation levels of oxygen in a
matter of seconds !! So the mash is almost devoid of oxygen and
Henry's Law of partial pressures forces atmospheric O2 into the mash.
Bamforth doesn't directly address the issue of O2 uptake in the boil,
but if we assume the enzymatic mechanisms are lost and the metal ion
catalytic mechanisms (which are the stronger ones) are enhanced by
temperture, then the boil is probably at least as bad in terms of
oxidized products as the mash.

All this oxygen ends up compounded with wort constituents. Oxidized
oils are probably primarily produced in the mash by the action various
lipo-oxygenase enzymes. These damaged oils break down producing the
trans-2-nonenal cardboard aroma and other aldehydic aromas.
Quantitatively phenolic compounds are the greatest destination for this
oxygen in wort. Simeple phenolic compounds often have pleasant fresh
flavors - or at least innocuous ones. Oxidized phenolics are more
bitter and will polymerize and eventually produce astringency. They
also are removed to some extent in the break material and in the
"dregs" left behind in the lagering process. Fining materials like
PVPP will remove oxidized phenolics too. Many other materials in
wort are oxidized in the mash & boil too.

After the chill, a fermentation is created and the yeast during their
anaerobic ferment have a dilemma - they are required to chemically
reduce the material in their environment to achieve a redox balance.
The major destination of all this reduction is in the creation of
ethanol from acetaldehyde, but also the conversion of other aldehydes
into alcohols and some other very flavor positive effects. Yeast
also leave a little (2-15ppm) of sulfite behind in the beer and
sulfite is an antioxidant. My hunch is that lager yeasts are
the better sulfite producers, and most ale yeasts - not so much.
More recently Morton Meilgard(sp?) has noted that some of the
extreme oxygen elimination methods developed for commercial brewing
have not proven to create a measurable improvement in flavor IN
COMMERCIAL BREWING.

Note that the amount of O2 exposure is largely related to the surface
area:volume ratio of the mash tun & copper. Also the amount of
"splashing" and transfer activity must impact this significantly.
Small HB tuns will therefore have a lot more potential for HSA,
than deeper commercial tuns. Oxidation is clearly more problematic
the smaller (shallower actually) the mash.

So here are the practical points -
Preboiling your mash water will NOT have a significant advantage.
Most of the HSA oxygen is introduces through the surface (which
increases with stirrig & splashing).
I've idly suggested in the past that we could mash (&boil) under an
inert gas layer - and this really is possible. I haven't tried it.
We could introduce an oxygen impermeable barrier to reduce the surface
area of the mash & boil. Aluminum foil or a food grade plastic layer.
80% coverage would bring HB mash tuns into the same surface:vol
ratios as commerial tuns. OTOH stirring & transfer are still
problematic.

Add sodium or potassium metabisulfite as anti-oxidants to the mash.
This method has been used in many tests and has been recommended by
some of the German brewing researchers. I add 1/2 crushed campden
tab per gallon of finished beer to the mash. I've done this with
some regularity in recent years and the resulting beer is a little
fresher, and metabisulphite has a notable impact in reducing the
color of light colored beers (another impact of oxidation).
I also think M.Meilgard has a point. Well made fresh HB seldom
has an oxidation flavor problem when young, probably due to the
terrific impact of the yeast. Bottle conditioned HB also seems to
have terrific shelf life if not mishandled. OTOH kegged or force
carbonated HB sometimes doesn't last so long. Certain beers
have notable aging problems - some of the dark malts in a munich
of n-bock seem to sometimes go south in a hurry.
Do try an HSA reduction method and evaluate it for yourself. I
think the metabisulfite addition makes a clear enough difference,
but it takes a little judgement to decide when it is called for.
-S (Steve Anderson)

Statistics: Posted by Owenbräu — Wed Apr 06, 2016 8:58 am


]]>