Sparge vs no sparge.

Wort making

Moderator: Brandon

User avatar
mpietropaoli
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:00 pm

Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby mpietropaoli » Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:49 pm

Ok. I've read the paper. Several times. I've asked some of the the questions.

My latest: how much fresh malt flavor am I sacrificing by doing a sparge? Our system would allow us to make 12 gallons or so with a no sparge, but if we maxed out the tun, we could make closer to 20 gallons if sparging to 4-5*P.

When implementing low o2 on our system, we could immerse a hose from the hlt to feed into the mash tun below the liquid level, so without o2 ingress (as opposed to the lawn-sprinkler type fly sparge arm we have that has been adding lots of o2).

Thanks again for sharing this great work guys!

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
There's no easy way out. There's no shortcut home.
Bryan R
Braumeister
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 9:27 pm

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Bryan R » Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:05 pm

Well, great question. I would say No sparge is the culmination of low o2 first, possible benefits of more flavors second. However many years ago(early 2000's) I did a test where we brewed the same beer at varying efficiencies from 50 to high 90's in 10% intervals. The beer was a pale ale. The common consensus was that the middle efficiency beer 60-70 had better flavor than the lower and certainly better than the upper. We attributed this to the amount of grain in tun. I would say it's subjective at best. We have plenty of spargers in this group that have great success.




-German Brewing Founder- :tu
User avatar
Roachbrau
Apprentice Brewer
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 8:41 pm
Location: West Virginia
Contact:

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Roachbrau » Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:11 pm

User avatar
mpietropaoli
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:00 pm

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby mpietropaoli » Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:32 pm

Ok so it sounds like even when adjusting for additional o2 ingress, assuming you had equal or lower DO readings, sparging made for a decidedly worse beer in your case. I was assuming we could deal with, or fully mitigate any negative o2 effects from the sparge.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
There's no easy way out. There's no shortcut home.
User avatar
Roachbrau
Apprentice Brewer
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 8:41 pm
Location: West Virginia
Contact:

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Roachbrau » Mon Apr 25, 2016 11:05 pm

No dissolved oxygen meter for me (yet), which is why I'm hesitant to provide a definitive answer. I can't say really what caused the improvement, since I also was dialing in recipes and fermentation process. I will say that forgoing decoctions didn't cause a marked decrease in the beer.
Kit_B
Apprentice Brewer
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 8:40 pm

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Kit_B » Mon Apr 25, 2016 11:09 pm

I have sparged & found good success.
The main problem is keeping it in the keg.
User avatar
Owenbräu
German Brewing
Posts: 1196
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 8:23 pm

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Owenbräu » Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:54 am

I sparge, and I have no problems.
- The best do the basics better -
Brew4Fun
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 8:02 pm

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Brew4Fun » Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:39 pm

It would seem that any form of batch sparging that leaves an emptied grainbed prior to the sparge would ruin any attempts at low O2, is that correct? I guess if you're pushing argon or nitrogen into the grainbed as it's draining then you might be alright, but aside from that.
Bryan R
Braumeister
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 9:27 pm

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Bryan R » Thu Jun 02, 2016 8:07 am





-German Brewing Founder- :tu
Brew4Fun
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 8:02 pm

Re: Sparge vs no sparge.

Postby Brew4Fun » Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:12 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests